← Cover EN IT

GNS Protocol — Vertical Case Studies

How Proof-of-Trajectory Creates Value Across 7 Industries

GNS Foundation · February 2026 Confidential — Investor & Partner Materials


Overview

GNS answers the question every digital platform needs answered: "Is this a real human?"

Unlike biometric approaches (WorldCoin's iris scanning) or document-based verification (traditional KYC), GNS proves humanity through behavioral proof — the unforgeable pattern of movement through the physical world over time. This approach is:

Each vertical below represents a distinct buyer persona, revenue stream, and go-to-market motion — all built on the same core protocol.


1. Space Insurance — Orbital TrIP

Status: 🟢 LIVE IN PRODUCTION

Business Workflow

flowchart LR subgraph DATA["🛰️ Data Sources"] CT[CelesTrak
Live TLE] CAT[Catalog
261 Satellites] end subgraph TRIP["⚙️ Orbital TrIP Pipeline"] SGP[SGP4
Propagation] BC[Breadcrumb
Chain
Ed25519] TS[Trust
Scoring] end subgraph PRODUCTS["💰 Commercial Products"] L1[L1: Analytical API
$500-15K/mo] L2[L2: Parametric Triggers
$1K-25K/event] L3[L3: Compliance Audits
$2K-50K/report] L4[L4: White-Label
$10K-150K/yr] end subgraph CLIENTS["🏢 B2B Clients"] BR[Brokers
Aon · Marsh
Lockton] UW[Underwriters
AXA XL · Lloyd's
Munich Re] REG[Regulators
ITU · ASI
ESA] end CT --> SGP CAT --> SGP SGP --> BC --> TS TS --> L1 & L2 & L3 & L4 L1 --> BR L2 --> UW L3 --> REG L4 --> UW style TRIP fill:#0ea5e9,color:#fff style PRODUCTS fill:#22c55e,color:#fff

The Market

The space insurance market collects approximately $600M in annual premiums covering roughly 300 actively insured satellites. In 2023, the sector experienced a catastrophic 179% loss ratio with claims approaching $1B. Notable losses include the Intelsat 33e breakup (October 2024, uninsured, 700+ debris fragments from a $500M satellite), SiriusXM SXM-7 ($225M total loss), and Viasat-3 ($420M potential loss from antenna deployment failure).

The core problem: unlike terrestrial insurance, satellite losses often cannot be independently investigated. Determining whether failure resulted from technical malfunction, environmental collision, or operator negligence remains largely guesswork. Underwriters price risk using actuarial tables from the 1990s because they have no continuous monitoring data.

The Buyer

GNS Solution: Orbital TrIP

Orbital TrIP applies the same Proof-of-Trajectory mechanism used for human identity to space objects. Every satellite receives:

Live today: 261 satellites tracked, 177 insured fleet flagged, 5 story satellites with detailed narratives, CelesTrak live data refreshing every 3 hours.

Integration Example

# Query a specific insured satellite
curl https://orbital-trip-production.up.railway.app/api/satellites/SES-1

{
  "name": "SES-1",
  "norad": 36516,
  "category": "GEO Comms",
  "operator": "SES",
  "insured": true,
  "trust": {
    "total": 87.4,
    "tier": "Odysseus",
    "consistency": 33.2,
    "compliance": 24,
    "maturity": 20,
    "corroboration": 8,
    "integrity": 10
  },
  "trip": {
    "pk": "a3f8c1d2e4b5...",
    "len": 144,
    "genesis": "7a2b3c4d...",
    "head": "9e8f7a6b..."
  }
}

Four-Layer Revenue Model

Layer Product Price Range Description
L1 Analytical API Subscriptions $500-$15K/month Real-time satellite health dashboards for brokers
L2 Parametric Trigger Fees $1K-$25K per event Automatic alerts: orbital insertion failure, station-keeping deviation, disposal verification, anomaly detection
L3 Compliance Audit Reports $2K-$50K per report Station-keeping compliance, debris mitigation, ESG sustainability scoring, forensic incident analysis
L4 White-Label Integration $10K-$150K/year TrIP scoring engine licenses, custom risk models, real-time webhook feeds embedded in underwriter platforms

Revenue Projection

Year Revenue Growth Driver
Year 1 €182K 5-10 broker subscriptions + first parametric triggers
Year 2 €1.39M 20+ brokers, compliance audit contracts, first white-label deal
Year 3 €6.95M Industry-standard scoring, regulatory adoption, full underwriter integration

Why It Matters for Investors

Orbital TrIP revenue validates the entire GNS thesis. If insurance brokers pay for trajectory-derived trust scores on satellites, that proves the same mechanism works for terrestrial identity. Real B2B revenue from Proof-of-Trajectory — before a single consumer downloads the app.


2. Digital Advertising & Ad Fraud

Status: 🟡 READY TO BUILD — largest TAM

Business Workflow

flowchart LR subgraph USER["📱 User"] DEV[Device with
GNS active] BC[Breadcrumbs
accumulated
6+ months] end subgraph GNS["⚙️ GNS Verify API"] VER[Identity
Verification] FE[Flocking Energy
Anti-spoofing] RES[Response:
trust_score
is_human: true] end subgraph ADTECH["💰 Ad-Tech Ecosystem"] DSP[DSPs
The Trade Desk
DV360] EX[Ad Exchange
Google · Meta] ADV[Advertiser
Fortune 500] end subgraph REVENUE["💵 Revenue"] R1[Startup: $49/mo
50K verifications] R2[Growth: $149/mo
200K verifications] R3[Enterprise: Custom
Unlimited] end DEV --> BC --> VER VER --> FE --> RES RES --> DSP DSP --> EX --> ADV RES -.->|$0.001/verification| R1 & R2 & R3 style GNS fill:#0ea5e9,color:#fff style REVENUE fill:#22c55e,color:#fff

The Market

Ad fraud costs the global digital advertising industry approximately $84 billion per year, with over $35 billion lost in the US alone. The problem is structural: advertisers pay per impression, click, or install — and bots can generate all three. Current anti-fraud solutions (DoubleVerify, IAS, HUMAN Security) use behavioral heuristics and device fingerprinting, both of which sophisticated bot farms increasingly evade.

The industry's core assumption is broken: "a device requesting an ad is a real person viewing it." There is no way to verify the physical existence of the entity behind the request.

The Buyer

GNS Solution

GNS Verify API adds a definitive signal to every ad request: "Is the device behind this impression operated by a verified human?"

A device running the GNS protocol accumulates breadcrumbs over weeks and months. A bot farm in a data center in Moscow cannot produce 6 months of realistic human movement patterns across a real city. This isn't behavioral heuristics — it's cryptographic proof of physical existence.

Integration Example

// Ad exchange verifies impression before bidding
const response = await fetch('https://api.gns.foundation/v1/verify', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'Authorization': 'Bearer sk_live_...' },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    device_tit: 'a3f8c1d2e4b5...', // Trajectory Identity Token
    context: 'ad_impression',
    minimum_trust: 0.4              // Reject devices below 40% trust
  })
});

const { verified, trust_score, breadcrumb_count, verification_level } = await response.json();

if (verified && trust_score > 0.4) {
  // Bid on this impression — verified human device
  submitBid(impressionId, bidAmount);
} else {
  // Skip — likely bot or unverified device
  logFraudSignal(impressionId, trust_score);
}

Revenue Model

Tier Monthly Price Verifications Target
Startup $49/mo 50,000/mo Small ad networks, indie publishers
Growth $149/mo 200,000/mo Mid-size DSPs, agency platforms
Scale $499/mo 1,000,000/mo Large ad exchanges
Enterprise Custom Unlimited Google-scale, The Trade Desk-scale

Unit economics: At $0.001 per verification (bulk), a platform processing 100M ad requests/day and filtering 30% as fraudulent saves $30M/year in wasted ad spend. GNS charges ~$100K/year for unlimited verification. The ROI is 300:1.

Why It Matters for Investors

Ad fraud is the largest addressable market for GNS by revenue potential. The $84B problem is growing as AI-powered bots become more sophisticated. GNS offers something no existing solution can: proof of physical existence, not just behavioral analysis. A single enterprise contract with a top-5 DSP could generate $500K+ ARR.


3. Social Media & Creator Economy

Status: 🟡 READY TO BUILD — B2C beachhead

Business Workflow

flowchart TB subgraph B2C["👤 B2C Flow — Creators & Users"] USER[User / Creator] APP[GNS App
Breadcrumb Collection] HANDLE["Claim @handle
100+ breadcrumbs"] GSITE[gSite
Verified link-in-bio
Free / $4.99/mo Pro] end subgraph B2B["🏢 B2B Flow — Platforms"] OIDC[GNS Auth OIDC
$0.01/login] DISC[Discord Bot
Community Guard
$9.99/mo] CREAT[Creator Verify API
$0.05/check] end subgraph PLAT["📱 Platform Clients"] TW[Twitter/X] TK[TikTok] DC[Discord] LT[Linktree
Alternatives] INF[Influencer
Marketing] end USER --> APP --> HANDLE HANDLE --> GSITE HANDLE --> OIDC OIDC --> TW & TK HANDLE --> DISC --> DC HANDLE --> CREAT --> INF GSITE --> LT style B2C fill:#a855f7,color:#fff style B2B fill:#0ea5e9,color:#fff

The Market

Social platforms collectively spend billions annually on content moderation, bot detection, and trust & safety. Twitter/X reported 5% of accounts are bots — independent researchers estimate 15-25%. Instagram influencer fraud (fake followers, engagement pods) costs brands an estimated $1.3B/year in wasted marketing spend. Creator platforms like Patreon, Substack, and Linktree have no way to verify that a creator is who they claim to be.

The verification problem runs deeper than blue checkmarks: "is this account operated by a real, unique human being?" is a question no current social platform can definitively answer.

The Buyer

GNS Solution

For platforms: "Login with GNS" — OIDC-compatible authentication that returns not just "who is this?" but "is this human, and how confident are we?" Every GNS login includes a trust score backed by months of cryptographic movement proof.

For creators: gSite — a verified identity page (Linktree killer) where every link, bio element, and social connection is backed by trajectory-verified identity. Not "this person paid $8 for a checkmark" but "this person has 6 months of verified human existence."

For communities: One human = one account. Discord servers can require GNS verification to eliminate raid bots. Subreddits can weight votes by trust score.

Integration Example

// Platform implements "Login with GNS" (standard OIDC flow)
app.get('/auth/gns/callback', async (req, res) => {
  const token = await exchangeCode(req.query.code);
  const identity = await verifyGNSToken(token);

  // identity contains:
  // {
  //   handle: "@alice",
  //   tit: "a3f8c1d2...",       // Trajectory Identity Token
  //   trust_score: 78.5,
  //   verification_level: "advanced",
  //   breadcrumb_count: 612,
  //   is_human: true,            // Flocking Energy classification
  //   chain_valid: true
  // }

  if (identity.trust_score >= 50) {
    grantVerifiedBadge(identity.handle);
  }

  createOrUpdateUser(identity);
});

Revenue Model

Product Model Price Target
GNS Auth (OIDC) Per-login $0.01/login (free tier: 500/mo) Platforms needing human verification
Verified gSite Freemium Free basic / $4.99/mo Pro Creators replacing Linktree
Creator Verification API Per-check $0.05/verification Influencer marketing platforms
Community Guard Per-server $9.99/mo per Discord server Community moderators

Go-to-Market: Discord/Gaming Beachhead

The B2C launch strategy targets gamers and Discord communities first:

  1. Trajectory Badge — gamified 5-tier progression (Seedling → Odysseus) that rewards movement
  2. Discord bot/verify command checks GNS trust score, assigns server roles
  3. Verified link-in-bio — gSite as the identity-native alternative to Linktree
  4. Creator verification — brands can filter influencer partnerships by trust score

Why It Matters for Investors

Social/Creator is the B2C on-ramp that builds the user base for all other verticals. Every person who claims a @handle and builds trajectory history becomes a verified identity that ad-tech, fintech, and enterprise buyers can later query. The viral loop: users verify to join communities → communities require verification to stay spam-free → more users verify.


4. Fintech & KYC/AML Compliance

Status: 🟡 READY TO BUILD — highest per-customer value

Business Workflow

flowchart LR subgraph CUST["👤 Bank Customer"] CL[Customer] DEV[Device with
GNS active] TRAJ[Continuous
Trajectory
12+ months] end subgraph GNS["⚙️ GNS Enterprise"] CONT[Continuous
Monitoring
$0.10/mo] ANOM[Anomaly
Detection] EDD[Enhanced Due
Diligence
$5/report] end subgraph BANK["🏦 Financial Institution"] COMP[Compliance
Team] RISK[Risk
Engine] AUDIT[Audit
Trail] end subgraph REG["⚖️ Regulators"] FATF[FATF
Travel Rule] MICA[EU MiCA] FINCEN[US FinCEN] end CL --> DEV --> TRAJ TRAJ --> CONT CONT --> ANOM ANOM -->|No anomaly| RISK ANOM -->|⚠️ Anomaly| EDD --> COMP RISK --> AUDIT AUDIT --> FATF & MICA & FINCEN style GNS fill:#0ea5e9,color:#fff style BANK fill:#22c55e,color:#fff

The Market

Financial institutions globally spend approximately $8 billion per year on Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance. The average cost per customer verification ranges from $60 to $500, with banks processing millions of checks annually. Despite this spending, regulatory fines for KYC/AML failures exceeded $5B in 2023 alone.

The fundamental flaw: KYC is a point-in-time document check. A person scans their passport once, and the system trusts them forever. Identity theft, synthetic identity fraud ($20B+ annually in the US), and account takeover attacks all exploit the gap between initial verification and ongoing trust.

The Buyer

GNS Solution

GNS transforms KYC from a one-time document check into continuous behavioral verification. A customer with 1,000 breadcrumbs across 12 months, moving through recognizable patterns in Rome, is demonstrably real — without uploading a single document.

Key differentiator: Traditional KYC answers "does this document match this face?" GNS answers "has this cryptographic identity been controlled by a real human being for the past 6 months?"

This doesn't replace document KYC — it augments it with an ongoing trust signal that makes re-verification and ongoing monitoring vastly cheaper and more reliable.

Integration Example

# Bank's ongoing customer verification (runs daily)
import gns

client = gns.Client(api_key="sk_live_...")

def daily_customer_check(customer_id, gns_handle):
    result = client.verify(
        handle=gns_handle,
        checks=["trust_score", "chain_validity", "trajectory_anomaly"],
        minimum_trust=0.6
    )

    if not result.chain_valid:
        # Breadcrumb chain broken — potential account compromise
        flag_for_review(customer_id, "chain_integrity_failure")

    if result.trajectory_anomaly:
        # Sudden location change inconsistent with history
        # e.g., account used from Lagos 2 hours after Rome breadcrumb
        trigger_enhanced_due_diligence(customer_id)

    if result.trust_score < 0.3:
        # Trust degradation — account dormant or pattern changed
        request_step_up_verification(customer_id)

    # Log for compliance audit trail
    log_verification(customer_id, result)

Revenue Model

Product Price Description
GNS Verify API (Fintech) $0.05/check Per-verification with enhanced fintech signals
Continuous Monitoring $2/customer/month Daily trust checks for active account base
Enhanced Due Diligence $5/report Deep trajectory analysis for flagged accounts
GNS Enterprise $50K-$200K/year On-premise TrIP nodes, custom risk models, SLA

Cost comparison:

Method Cost per Customer Frequency Confidence
Traditional KYC (Jumio) $2-$5 One-time Moderate (document can be forged)
Ongoing monitoring (World-Check) $0.50/mo Daily screening Low (name matching only)
GNS Continuous Verification $0.10/mo Real-time High (cryptographic behavioral proof)

Why It Matters for Investors

Fintech/KYC has the highest per-customer revenue of any GNS vertical. A single neobank with 5M customers paying $0.10/month for continuous verification = $6M ARR. The regulatory tailwind is strong: FATF Travel Rule, EU MiCA, US FinCEN increasingly mandate ongoing customer due diligence that goes beyond one-time document checks.


5. Enterprise IAM (Identity & Access Management)

Status: 🔵 PHASE 2 — requires SOC 2

Business Workflow

flowchart LR subgraph EMP["👤 Employee"] E[Employee
with @handle] PWD[Login
Password + MFA] TRAJ[Trajectory
Verification
3rd factor] end subgraph GNS["⚙️ GNS Auth Enterprise"] OIDC[OIDC Provider
$3/user/mo] NS[Org Namespace
acme@staff
$49-999/yr] NODE[Managed TrIP Node
$10K-150K/yr] end subgraph CORP["🏢 Corporate Infrastructure"] SSO[SSO / IdP
Okta · Entra ID] SOC[SOC Team
SIEM · Webhooks] RES[Corporate
Resources] end E --> PWD --> OIDC E --> TRAJ --> OIDC OIDC --> NS NS --> SSO --> RES OIDC -->|⚠️ Anomaly| SOC NODE --> OIDC style GNS fill:#0ea5e9,color:#fff style CORP fill:#22c55e,color:#fff

The Market

The enterprise IAM market exceeds $18 billion annually, dominated by Okta ($2.5B revenue), Microsoft Entra ID, and Auth0 (acquired by Okta for $6.5B). Despite massive spending, identity remains the #1 attack vector: 80% of breaches involve compromised credentials (Verizon DBIR 2024). Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is increasingly bypassed through MFA fatigue attacks, SIM swapping, and adversary-in-the-middle phishing.

The gap: current IAM systems verify credentials (something you know, something you have), but cannot verify physical presence. A stolen laptop with cached MFA tokens works the same in the hands of a thief as in the hands of the legitimate user.

The Buyer

GNS Solution

GNS adds an unforgeable third factor to enterprise authentication: "Is this person physically where they should be, moving like a real human?"

Employee authenticates normally (password + MFA). GNS adds trajectory verification — even if credentials are stolen, the attacker doesn't have the physical trajectory that accumulated on the legitimate user's device over months. This is not geofencing (easily spoofed with GPS faker). It's cryptographic proof of consistent physical existence over time, validated by Flocking Energy analysis that detects GPS spoofing.

Integration Example

// Enterprise SSO middleware adds GNS trajectory check
const gnsMiddleware = async (req, res, next) => {
  const session = getOIDCSession(req);

  // Standard OIDC authentication passed — now add GNS layer
  const gnsCheck = await gns.verifyEmployee({
    tit: session.gns_tit,
    org_namespace: 'acme',       // @acme organization
    required_trust: 0.5,
    check_anomaly: true,
    max_location_age_hours: 24   // Last breadcrumb within 24h
  });

  if (gnsCheck.anomaly_detected) {
    // Trajectory inconsistent — possible credential theft
    await notifySOC(session.user, gnsCheck.anomaly_details);
    return res.redirect('/step-up-verification');
  }

  if (gnsCheck.trust_score < 0.5) {
    // New or inactive device — require additional verification
    return res.redirect('/device-verification');
  }

  req.gns = gnsCheck;
  next();
};

Revenue Model

Product Price Description
Organization Namespaces $49-$999/year 5 tiers by member count (see presentation Section 11)
GNS Auth Enterprise $3/user/month OIDC provider with trajectory verification
Managed TrIP Nodes $10K-$150K/year On-premise infrastructure for air-gapped environments
SOC Integration Custom SIEM webhook feeds, threat intelligence API

Why It Matters for Investors

Enterprise IAM is a proven $18B market where Okta alone generates $2.5B revenue. GNS doesn't replace Okta — it adds a layer that Okta fundamentally cannot provide (physical presence verification). The integration path is clean: OIDC-compatible drop-in that works with existing IdP infrastructure. The SOC 2 compliance milestone (Q1 2027) unlocks this vertical for enterprise sales.


6. AI Safety & Proof-of-Humanity

Status: 🔵 PHASE 2 — regulatory timing critical

Business Workflow

flowchart TB subgraph CREATOR["✍️ Human Creator"] HUM[Author with
verified @handle] CONT[Content
Article · Post
Dataset · Label] end subgraph GNS["⚙️ GNS Attestation API"] VER[Humanity
Verification] ATT[Attestation
Signature
Ed25519] META[Metadata:
trust_score
timestamp
content_hash] end subgraph CLIENTS["🏢 Clients"] direction TB PLAT[Content Platforms
Medium · Substack
Wikipedia] AI[AI Companies
OpenAI · Anthropic
Scale AI] REG[Regulators
NIST · EU AI Office
FTC] end subgraph REVENUE["💵 Revenue"] R1[Content Attestation
$0.02/attestation] R2[Training Data Verify
$0.10/sample] R3[Compliance Reports
$5K-25K/report] R4[Enterprise License
$50K-200K/yr] end HUM --> VER CONT --> ATT VER --> ATT --> META META --> PLAT & AI & REG META -.-> R1 & R2 & R3 & R4 style GNS fill:#0ea5e9,color:#fff style REVENUE fill:#22c55e,color:#fff

The Market

AI-generated content is becoming indistinguishable from human-created content. Deepfakes, AI-written articles, synthetic voices, and generated images are eroding trust in all digital media. The US Executive Order 14110 on AI Safety explicitly calls for identity verification standards. NIST is developing AI identity frameworks. The EU AI Act requires disclosure of AI-generated content.

The emerging market for "proof-of-humanity" — verifying that content, interactions, and decisions originate from real humans — is estimated to grow from $2B today to $100B+ by 2030. Every AI company, content platform, and regulatory body needs an answer to: "Did a real human create/approve this?"

The Buyer

GNS Solution

GNS provides cryptographic attestation that a specific piece of content was created or approved by a verified human identity. Not "this account claims to be human" but "this account has months of cryptographically-proven physical existence, validated by Flocking Energy anti-spoofing analysis."

For content platforms: Every post, article, or comment can carry a GNS attestation — a signature from a trajectory-verified identity with a specific trust score.

For AI training data: Data labeled or created by GNS-verified humans carries provenance proof. Training datasets can be filtered by contributor trust score, ensuring human-quality annotations.

For regulatory compliance: GNS attestation provides the kind of auditable, cryptographic proof that EO 14110 and the EU AI Act envision — without requiring centralized biometric databases.

Integration Example

# Content platform verifies human authorship
import gns

def publish_article(article, author_handle):
    # Verify the author is human before publishing
    verification = gns.verify(
        handle=author_handle,
        context="content_creation",
        minimum_trust=0.6
    )

    if not verification.is_human:
        return {"error": "Author humanity verification failed"}

    # Create signed attestation
    attestation = gns.attest(
        content_hash=sha256(article.body),
        author_tit=verification.tit,
        trust_at_time=verification.trust_score,
        timestamp=datetime.utcnow()
    )

    article.gns_attestation = attestation
    article.verified_human = True
    article.trust_score = verification.trust_score

    # Readers can verify: "Was this written by a real person?"
    # Regulators can audit: "What was the author's trust level?"
    return save_and_publish(article)

Revenue Model

Product Price Description
Content Attestation API $0.02/attestation Sign content with human verification proof
Training Data Verification $0.10/sample Verify human origin of training data samples
Compliance Reporting $5K-$25K/report Audit reports for regulatory submissions
Enterprise License $50K-$200K/year Full integration for AI companies

Why It Matters for Investors

The timing window is critical. US EO 14110 creates demand. NIST frameworks are being drafted now. The EU AI Act takes effect in stages through 2026. GNS's IETF Internet-Draft positions it as a standards-compliant solution rather than a proprietary vendor. If GNS becomes the IETF-standard method for proof-of-humanity, every AI company and content platform becomes a potential customer.


7. Gaming, Web3 & Airdrop Protection

Status: 🟡 READY TO BUILD — Discord beachhead strategy

Business Workflow

flowchart LR subgraph PLAYER["🎮 Player / Web3 User"] PL[Player] GNS_APP[GNS App
Trajectory Badge
5 tiers] TIT[Verified TIT
trust_score > 50] end subgraph API["⚙️ GNS Sybil Guard"] CHECK[Uniqueness
Verification] FE[Flocking Energy
Anti-bot] SCORE[Trust Score
→ Allocation
Multiplier] end subgraph CLIENTS["🏢 Clients"] GAME[Game Studios
Riot · Epic · Valve
$0.05/account] WEB3[Web3 Projects
Airdrops
$0.01/claim] DAO[DAOs
Governance
$500/mo] ESPORT[Esports
Tournaments
Custom] end subgraph RESULT["✅ Result"] FAIR[1 Human =
1 Account =
1 Claim =
1 Vote] end PL --> GNS_APP --> TIT TIT --> CHECK --> FE --> SCORE SCORE --> GAME & WEB3 & DAO & ESPORT GAME & WEB3 & DAO --> FAIR style API fill:#0ea5e9,color:#fff style RESULT fill:#22c55e,color:#fff

The Market

Bot and multi-account abuse is endemic across gaming and Web3:

The common thread: there is no reliable way to enforce one human = one account across digital platforms.

The Buyer

GNS Solution

GNS provides cryptographic Sybil resistance: one real human trajectory = one verified identity = one account/claim/vote. A Sybil attacker cannot produce 1,000 distinct physical movement patterns simultaneously — each GNS identity requires months of unique trajectory data validated by Flocking Energy analysis.

For airdrops: Filter claims by GNS trust score. Only identities with 6+ months of verified trajectory receive tokens. Eliminates Sybil at the protocol level.

For gaming: GNS-verified accounts get priority matchmaking, ranked access, and anti-smurf protections. Creating a new account requires building trajectory history from scratch.

For DAOs: Quadratic voting weighted by GNS trust score. One person with one trajectory gets one meaningful vote, regardless of how many wallets they control.

Integration Example

// Web3 airdrop claim with Sybil protection
async function claimAirdrop(walletAddress, gnsTIT) {
  // Step 1: Verify GNS identity
  const verification = await gns.verify({
    tit: gnsTIT,
    minimum_trust: 0.5,
    minimum_breadcrumbs: 200,
    check_uniqueness: true     // Has this TIT already claimed?
  });

  if (!verification.verified) {
    return { error: "GNS verification failed", reason: verification.reason };
  }

  if (verification.already_claimed) {
    return { error: "This identity has already claimed" };
  }

  // Step 2: Scale allocation by trust score
  const baseAllocation = 1000;  // tokens
  const trustMultiplier = 1 + (verification.trust_score / 100);  // 1.0x to 2.0x
  const allocation = Math.floor(baseAllocation * trustMultiplier);

  // Step 3: Record claim linked to GNS identity (not wallet)
  await recordClaim(verification.tit, walletAddress, allocation);

  // One human = one claim, cryptographically enforced
  return { success: true, tokens: allocation, trust: verification.trust_score };
}

Revenue Model

Product Price Description
Sybil Guard API $0.01/check Per-verification for airdrop claims
Game Account Verification $0.05/account Deep verification for ranked play access
DAO Governance Module $500/mo per DAO Trust-weighted voting integration
Tournament Integrity Custom Anti-smurf verification for esports

Airdrop economics: A Web3 project distributing $50M in tokens with 35% Sybil loss = $17.5M wasted. GNS Sybil Guard at $0.01/check across 500K claimants = $5K total cost. Prevention ROI: 3,500:1.

Why It Matters for Investors

Gaming/Web3 is the ideal B2C on-ramp. Gamers are early adopters. Discord servers are natural distribution channels. The Trajectory Badge gamification system turns identity verification into an engagement mechanic. Users who verify for Discord/gaming later become verified identities for fintech, enterprise, and ad-tech use cases — building the network effect that powers every other vertical.


8. GNS Vault — Password Manager with Human Verification

Status: 🟢 LIVE IN PRODUCTION — 111 tests passing, Demo Store active

Business Workflow

flowchart LR subgraph USER["👤 User"] USR[User] EXT[Chrome Extension
GNS Vault] KEY[Ed25519 Key
Identity + Wallet] end subgraph VAULT["🔐 GNS Vault Core"] CRED[Credential Vault
XChaCha20-Poly1305] KDF[Argon2id KDF
t=3 m=64MiB] SYNC[P2P Sync
X25519] end subgraph VERIFY["✓ Human Verification"] TRIP[TrIP Badge
Bronze → Diamond] SDK[Auth SDK
5.1KB] API[Verify API
Challenge-Response] end subgraph SITES["🌐 Partner Websites"] ECOM[E-commerce
Sign in with GNS] SAAS[SaaS
Bot Protection] WEB3[Web3
Sybil Resistance] end USR --> EXT --> KEY KEY --> CRED --> KDF KEY --> TRIP --> SDK --> API API --> ECOM & SAAS & WEB3 CRED --> SYNC style VAULT fill:#0ea5e9,color:#fff style VERIFY fill:#22c55e,color:#fff

The Market

The password manager market is worth $3.5B and growing 12% annually. But traditional managers have fundamental problems:

None of these solve the "are you human?" problem alongside credential management. GNS Vault is the only one that combines:

The Buyer

GNS Solution

GNS Vault unifies three functions in a single Ed25519 key:

Credential Vault: XChaCha20-Poly1305 encryption with Argon2id KDF. Passwords never leave your device. P2P sync between devices without cloud.

Human Verification: Your TrIP trust score is built into the extension. Sites can verify you're human by calling the API — no CAPTCHA, no iris scan.

Crypto Wallet: The same Ed25519 key is a valid Stellar wallet address. Send USDC/EURC to @handles via IDUP layer.

Integration Example

// "Sign in with GNS" integration — just 10 lines
<script src="https://cdn.gcrumbs.com/auth-sdk.js"></script>
<button onclick="gnsAuth()">Sign in with GNS</button>

<script>
async function gnsAuth() {
  const result = await GNS.authenticate({
    challenge: await fetch('/api/challenge').then(r => r.text()),
    minTrust: 20  // Require at least Bronze badge
  });
  
  // result = { publicKey, signature, trustScore, badgeTier }
  if (result.trustScore >= 20) {
    // User verified as real human
    await fetch('/api/login', {
      method: 'POST',
      body: JSON.stringify(result)
    });
  }
}
</script>

Revenue Model

Product Price Description
Chrome Extension Free Password manager + human verification for users
Auth SDK (B2B) $0.005/verification "Sign in with GNS" for websites
Verify API (B2B) $0.01/check Standalone human verification for bot protection
Enterprise License $2,000/month Self-hosted Trust Engine + dedicated support

TAM Economics: Password manager market = $3.5B. If GNS Vault captures 0.1% = $3.5M ARR potential. But the real value is the network effect: every Vault user becomes a verified identity that powers all other GNS verticals.

Why It Matters for Investors

GNS Vault is the perfect B2C on-ramp. Users download it to solve a real problem (password management), and in the process become TrIP-verified identities. Every Vault user can then be monetized through:

User acquisition cost is near-zero (free extension, natural viral loop), while lifetime value grows as users engage with more GNS services. It's the flywheel that connects B2C acquisition with B2B monetization.


Cross-Vertical Revenue Summary

Vertical Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Primary Product
Space Insurance €182K €1.39M €6.95M Orbital TrIP API
Ad Fraud €80K €900K €4.5M GNS Verify API
Social/Creator €50K €600K €3.2M GNS Auth + gSite
Fintech/KYC €120K €1.1M €5.5M GNS Enterprise
Enterprise IAM €20K €350K €2.5M Auth + Namespaces
AI/PoH €10K €250K €1.8M Attestation API
Gaming/Web3 €40K €400K €2.2M Sybil Guard API
GNS Vault €60K €500K €3.5M Auth SDK + Verify API
Combined €562K €5.49M €30.15M

Note: These projections are conservative and assume GNS captures <0.1% of each vertical's TAM by Year 3.


Go-to-Market Priority

Phase 1 (Now — Q2 2026): Revenue Validation 1. Space Insurance — Live today, pursue broker partnerships 2. GNS Vault — Live today, 111 tests passing, Demo Store active 3. Gaming/Web3 — Discord beachhead, Trajectory Badge B2C launch

Phase 2 (Q3-Q4 2026): Scale 4. Ad Fraud — First DSP integration partner 5. Fintech/KYC — Neobank pilot (continuous verification) 6. Social/Creator — gSite launch, "Login with GNS" SDK

Phase 3 (2027): Enterprise 7. Enterprise IAM — Post-SOC 2, organization namespace sales 8. AI/PoH — Regulatory-driven adoption, NIST alignment


The Common Thread

Every vertical asks the same question in a different language:

Vertical The Question
Space Insurance "Is this satellite where it claims to be?"
Ad Fraud "Is a real human viewing this ad?"
Social Media "Is this account operated by a real person?"
Fintech/KYC "Is this customer continuously real?"
Enterprise IAM "Is this employee physically present?"
AI Safety "Did a real human create this content?"
Gaming/Web3 "Is this one unique real person?"
GNS Vault "Is this user human and are their credentials secure?"

GNS answers all of them with the same mechanism: cryptographic proof that a physical entity has moved through the real world over time, creating an unforgeable behavioral signature.

One protocol. Eight revenue streams. $148B+ combined TAM.


GNS Protocol · ULISSY s.r.l. · Rome, Italy Patent Pending #63/948,788 · IETF Internet-Draft draft-ayerbe-trip-protocol-02 Contact: @camiloayerbe